Scripting News: 6/4/2004
If Atom turns them down, as it appears they will, the W3C can start with RSS, which has a much larger installed base, is better-known and has a five-year head-start. It's the front-runner by a wide margin.
Yeah, Dean was the front-runner too at one point. There's a big danger with this "stick with the main purveyor of syndication goodness since 1999" stuff: the web is littered with the husks of the next big thing that failed to adapt and thus died. You can make the case that Atom only even exists because RSS was declared "frozen," at least for you, that is, and thus the only way to get further features into syndication was to create a new format. This new "clarification" is even weirder - if there'd been the willingness to listen to developers and do this a few years ago, and do it right, with attention paid to extensibility, backwards compatibility and none of this "tee-hee, guess AGAIN!" childishness about "funkiness," we'd all probably be raving about how cool RSS 2.5 is and how it's poised to take over the universe. Instead, we're only really getting the "clarification" because RSS crapped the bed when Reuters tried to use it to display characters generally thought of as markup, despite not using them as such. Whoops. Unfortunately, comparable glitches will bite RSS in the butt more often as companies start using it more, at which point arguments for "simplicity" like "You can author the feed in Notepad!" will garner the eminently reasonable response "Why would you want to do that?"
Sidenote to advocates: Generally, it is not a good idea to use the doctor joke punch-line "Don't do that" when a user says, "It breaks when I do this." Especially when your purported reason for dumbing down the format is for the users' sake in the first place. Whenever you ask that question, you've failed somewhere.